India in the Eighteenth

 CenturyBahadur Shah 1 (1707-12)

• Muzam succeeded Aurungzeb after latter’s death in 1707
• He acquired the title of Bahadur Shah.
• Though he was quite old (65) and his rule quite short there are many significant achievements he made
• He reversed the narrow minded and antagonistic policies of Aurungzeb
• Made agreements with Rajput states
• Granted sardeshmukhi to Marathas but not Chauth
• Released Shahuji (son of Sambhaji) from prison (who later fought with Tarabai)
• Tried to make peace with Guru Gobind Sahib by giving him a high Mansab. After Guru’s death, Sikhs again revolted under the leadership of Banda Bahadur. This led to a prolonged war with the Sikhs.
• Made peace with Chhatarsal, the Bundela chief and Churaman, the Jat chief.
• State finances deteriorated

Jahandar Shah (1712-13)

• Death of Bahadur Shah plunged the empire into a civil war
• A noted feature of this time was the prominence of the nobles
• Jahandar Shah, son of Bahadur Shah, ascended the throne in 1712 with help from Zulfikar Khan
• Was a weak ruler devoted only to pleasures
• Zulfikar Khan, his wazir, was virtually the head of the administration
• ZK abolished jizyah
• Peace with Rajputs: Jai Singh of Amber was made the Governor of Malwa. Ajit Singh of Marwar was made the Governor of Gujarat.
• Chauth and Sardeshmukh granted to Marathas. However, Mughals were to collect it and then hand it over to the Marathas.
• Continued the policy of suppression towards Banda Bahadur and Sikhs
• Ijarah: (revenue farming) the government began to contract with revenue farmers and middlemen to pay the government a fixed amount of money while they were left free to collect whatever they could from the peasants
• Jahandhar Shah defeated in January 1713 by his nephew Farrukh Siyar at Agra

Farrukh Siyar (1713-19)

• Owed his victory to Saiyid Brothers: Hussain Ali Khan Barahow and Abdullah Khan
• Abdullah Khan: Wazir, Hussain Ali: Mir Bakshi
• FS was an incapable ruler. Saiyid brothers were the real rulers.
• Saiyid Brothers
  • Known the Indian History as King Makers
  • adopted the policy of religious tolerance. Abolished jizyah (again?). Pilgrim tax was abolished from a number of places
  • Marathas: Granted Shahuji swarajya and the right to collect chauth and sardeshmukhi of the six provinces of the Deccan
  • They failed in their effort to contain rebellion because they were faced with constant political rivalry, quarrels and conspiracies at the court.
  • Nobles headed by Nizam-ul-Mulk and Muhammad Amin Khan began to conspire against them
  • In 1719, the Saiyid Brothers killed and overthrew FS.
  • This was followed by placing, in quick succession, of two young princes who died of consumption
  • Murder of the emperor created a wave of revulsion against the SB. They were looked down as ‘namak haram’
• Now, they placed 18 year old Muhammad Shah as the emperor of India
• In 1720, the nobles assassinated Hussain Ali Khan, the younger of the SB. Abdullah Khan was also defeated at Agra

Muhammad Shah ‘Rangeela’ (1719-1748)

• Weak-minded, frivolous and over-fond of a life of ease
• Neglected the affairs of the state
• Intrigued against his own ministers
• Naizam ul Mulk Qin Qulich Khan, the wazir, relinquished his office and founded the state of Hyderabad in 1724
  • “His departure was symbolic of the flight of loyalty and virtue from the Empire”
• Heriditary nawabs arose in Bengal, Hyderabad, Awadh and Punjab
• Marathas conquered Malwa, Gujarat and Bundelkhand
• 1738: Invasion of Nadir Shah

Nadir Shah’s Invasion (1738)

• Attracted to India by its fabulous wealth. Continual campaigns had made Persia bankrupt
• Also, the Mughal empire was weak.
• Didn’t meet any resistance as the defense of the north-west frontier had been neglected for years
• The two armies met at Karnal on 13^th Feb 1739. Mughal army was summarily defeated. MS taken prisoner
• Massacre in Delhi in response to the killing of some of his soldiers
• Plunder of about 70 crore rupees. Carried away the Peacock throne and Koh-i-noor
• MS ceded to him all the provinces of the Empire west of the river Indus
• Significance: Nadir Shah’s invasion exposed the hidden weakness of the empire to the Maratha sardars and the foreign trading companies

Ahmed Shah Abdali

• One of the generals of Nadir Shah
• Repeatedly invaded and plundered India right down to Delhi and Mathura between 1748 and 1761. He invaded India five times.
• 1761: Third battle of Panipat. Defeat of Marathas.
• As a result of invasions of Nadir Shah and Ahmed Shah, the Mughal empire ceased to be an all-India empire. By 1761 it was reduced merely to the Kingdom of Delhi

Shah Alam II (1759-

• Ahmed Bahadur (1748-54) succeeded Muhammad Shah
• Ahmed Bahadur was succeeded by Alamgir II (1754-59)
  • 1756: Abdali plundered Mathura
• Alamgir II was succeeded by Shah Jahan III
• Shah Jahan III succeeded by Shah Alam II in 1759
• Shah Alam spent initial years wandering for he lived under the fear of his wazir
• In 1764, he joined forces with Mir Qasim of Bengal and Shuja-ud-Daula of Awadh in declaring a war upon the British East India company. This resulted in the Battle of Buxar
• Pensioned at Allahabad
• Returned to Delhi in 1772 under the protection of Marathas

Decline of the Mughal Empire

• After 1759, Mughal empire ceased to be a military power.
• It continued from 1759 till 1857 only due to the powerful hold that the Mughal dynasty had on the minds of the people of India as a symbol of the political unity of the country
• In 1803, the British occupied Delhi
• From 1803 to 1857, the Mughal emperors merely served as a political front of the British.
• The most important consequence of the fall of the Mughal empire was that it paved way for the British to conquer India as there was no other Indian power strong enough to unite and hold India.

Succession States

• These states arose as a result of the assertion of autonomy by governors of Mughal provinces with the decay of the central power
• Bengal, Awadh, Hyderabad

Hyderabad and the Carnatic

• Founded by Nizam-ul-Mulk Asaf Jah in 1724
• Tolerant policy towards Hindus
  • A Hindu, Puran Chand, was his Dewan.
• Established an orderly administration in Deccan on the basis of the jagirdari system on the Mughal pattern
• He died in 1748
• Nawab of Carnatic freed himself of the control of the Viceroy of the Deccan and made his office hereditary
  • Saadutullah Khan of Carnatic made his nephew Dost Ali his successor

Bengal

• 1700: Murshid Quli Khan made the Dewan of Bengal
• Freed himself of the central control
• Freed Bengal of major uprisings
  • Three major uprisings during his time: Sitaram Ray, Udai Narayan and Ghulam Muhammad, and then by Shujat Khan, and finally by Najat Khan
• Carried out fresh revenue settlement. Introduced the system of revenue-farming.
• Revenue farming led to the increased distress of the farmers
• Laid the foundations of the new landed aristocracy in Bengal
• MQK died in 1727. Succeeded by Shuja-ud-din.
• 1739: Alivardi Khan killed and deposed Shuja-ud-din’s son, Sarfaraz Khan, and made himself the Nawab
• All three Nawabs encouraged merchants, both Indian and foreign.
• Safety of roads and rivers. Thanas and Chowkies at regular intervals.
• Maintained strict control over the foreign trading companies
• They, however, did not firmly put down the increasing tendency of the English East India Company to use military force, or to threaten its use, to get its demands accepted.
• They also neglected to build a strong army

Awadh

• 1722: Saadat Khan Burhan-ul-Mulk
• Suppressed rebellions and disciplined the Zamindars
• Fresh revenue settlement in 1723
• Did not discriminate between Hindus and Muslims. The highest post in his government was held by a Hindu, Maharaja Nawab Rai
• Died in 1739. Succeeded by Safdar Jung.
• SJ’s reign was an era of peace
• made an alliance with the Maratha sardars
• Carried out warfare against Rohelas and Bangash Pathans
• Organized an equitable system of justice
• Distinct culture of Lucknow developed during his period

Mysore

• Haidar Ali, in 1761, overthrew Nanjaraj and established his own authority over Mysore
• 1755: Established a modern arsenal at Dindigal with the help of French experts
• Conquered Bidnur, Sunda, Sera, Canara and Malabar
• He conquered Malabar because he wanted access to the Indian Ocean
• First and Second Anglo-Mysore War
• 1782: Succeeded by Tipu Sultan
• TS was an innovator. Introduced a new calendar, a new system of coinage and new scales of weights and measures.
• Keen interest in French Revolution
  • Planted a ‘tree of liberty’ at Srirangapatnam and became a member of the Jacobin Club
• Made efforts to build a modern navy
• Mysore flourished economically under Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan
• Sent missions to France, Turkey, Iran and Pegu Myanmar to develop foreign trade
• Some historians say that Tipu was a religious fanatic. But facts don’t support this assertion.

Kerala

• Divided into large number of feudal chiefs in the 18^th century
• Four important states
  • Calicut (under Zamorin), Chirakkal, Cochin and Travancore
• In 1729, Travancore rose to prominence under King Martanda Varma
• Conquered Quilon and Elayadam, and defeated the Dutch
• From 1766 Haidar Ali invaded Kerala and annexed northern Kerala up to Cochin
• Revival of Malyalam literature
  • Trivandram became a famous centre of Sanskrit scholarship

Rajput States

• Rajputana states continued to be divided as before
• Raja Sawai Jai Singh of Amber was the most outstanding ruler of the era
  • Founded the city of Jaipur
  • Made Jaipur a great seat of science and art
  • Erected observatories at Jaipur, Ujjain, Varanasi, and Mathura
  • Drew up a set of tables, entitled Zij Muhammadshahi, to enable people to make astronomical observations
  • Translated Euclid’s “Elements of Geometry” into Sanskrit
  • Social reformers. Reduce lavish marriage expenditures.

Jats

• Jat peasants revolted in 1669 and 1688
• Jat state of Bharatpur set up by Churaman and Badan Singh
• Reached its highest glory under Suraj Mal, who ruled from 1756 to 1763

Sikhs

• Sikhsim transformed into a militant religion during Guru Hargobind (1606-45), the sixth guru.
• Guru Gobind Singh waged constant war against the armies of Aurangzeb and the hill rajas
• After Guru Gobind Singh’s death (1708), leadership passed to Banda Singh (Banda Bahadur)
  • He struggled with the Mughal army for 8 years
  • Put to death in 1715
• Banda Bahadur failed because
  • Mughal centre was still strong
  • Upper classes and castes of Punjab joined forces against him
  • He could not integrate all the anti-Mughal forces because of his religious bigotry
• After the withdrawal of Abdali from Punjab, Sikhs were again resurgent
• Between 1765 and 1800 they brought the Punjab and Jammu under their control
• They were organized into 12 misls
• Ranjit Singh
  • Chief of the Sukerchakia Misl
  • Captured Lahore (1799) and Amritsar (1802)
  • Conquered Kashmir, Peshawar and Multan
  • Possessed the second best army in Asia
  • Tolerant and liberal
  • Fakir Azizuddin and Dewan Dina Nath were his important ministers
  • “known to step down from his throne to wipe the dust off the feet of Muslim mendicants with his long grey beard”
  • Negative point: He did not remove the threat of British. He only left it over to his successors. And so, after his death, when his kingdom was torn by intense internal struggle, English conquered it.

Marathas

• Maratha Families
  • Peshwa – Pune
  • Gaekwad – Baroda
  • Bhosle – Nagpur
  • Holkar – Indore
  • Scindia – Gwalior
• The most powerful of the succession states
• Could not fill the political vacuum because
  • Maratha Sardars lacked unity
  • Lacked the outlook and programme which were necessary for founding an all-India empire
• Shahuji
  • Son of Sambhaji
  • Imprisoned by Aurungzeb
  • Released in 1707
  • Civil war between Shahu and his aunt Tarabai who ruled in the name of her infant son Shivaji II
  • The conflict gave rise to a new era of Maratha leadership, the era of Peshwa leadership
• Balaji Vishwnath
  • 1713: Peshwa of King Shahu
  • Induced Zulfikar Khan to grant the chauth and sardeshmukhi of the Deccan
  • Helped the Saiyid brothers in overthrowing Farukh Siyar
  • Maratha sardars were becoming individually strong but collectively weak
  • Died in 1720. Succeeded by his son Baji Rao I
• Baji Rao I
  • the greatest extent of guerrilla tactics after Shivaji
  • Vast areas ceded by the Mughals
  • Marathas won control over Malwa, Gujarat and parts of Bundelkhand
  • Rivalry with Nizam ul Mulk
  • Compelled the Nizam to grant chauth and sardeshmukhi of the Deccan provinces
  • 1733: Campaign against Sidis of Janjira and the Portuguese (Salsette and Bassein)
  • Died in 1740
  • Captured territories but failed to lay the foundations of an empire
  • Succeeded by Balaji Baji Rao (Nana Saheb)
• Balaji Baji Rao (1740-61)
  • Shahu died in 1749. Peshwas became the de facto rulers
  • Shifted the capital to Poona
  • Captured Orissa
  • Mysore forced to pay tributes
  • In 1752, helped Imad-ul-Mulk to become the wazir
  • Brought Punjab under their control and expelled the agent of Ahmad Shah Abdali
    • This led AS Abdali to come to India to settle accounts with Marathas in the Third Battle of Panipat
  • Third Battle of Panipat
    • ASA formed an alliance with Najib-ud-daulah of Rohilkhand and Shuja-ud-daulah of Awadh.

Saranjami system?

Social and economic condition

Administrative Organization of the British

Army

Army fulfilled four important functions:

1. Instrument to conquer Indian powers
2. Defended the British Empire in India against foreign rivals
3. Safe-guarded against internal revolt
4. Chief instrument for extending and defending the British Empire in Asia and Africa.

Bulk of the army consisted of Indians. In 1857, of the total strength of 311400, about 265900 were Indians. Highest Indian rank was that of Subedar.

British could conquer and control India through a predominantly Indian army because:

1. There was absence of modern nationalism at that time
2. The company paid its soldiers regularly and well, as opposed to the Indian rulers and chieftains.

Police

Cornwallis was responsible for the creation of a modern police system in India. He established a system of Thanas (or circles) headed by a daroga. The police:

1. Prevented organization of a large-scale conspiracy against foreign control
2. Was used to suppress the national movement.

Judiciary

Though started by Hastings, the system was stabilized by Cornwallis.

Civil Cases

District: Diwani Adalat (civil court) presided over by the District Judge

Provincial Court: Appeal from civil court

Sardar Diwani Adalat: Highest appeal

There were also, below the District Court, Registrar’s Court (headed by Europeans) and subordinate courts headed by Indians known as munsifs or amins.

Criminal Cases

4 divisions of Bengal presidency. Each had a Court of Circuit presided over by the civil servants. Appeals could be made to Sardar Nizamat Adalat.

William Bentinck:

• Abolished the provincial courts of appeal and circuit
• Their work was assigned to District Collectors
• Raised the status and power of Indians in the Judicial service.

In 1865, High Courts were established at Madras, Calcutta and Bombay.

British brought about  uniformity in the system of law. In 1833, the government appointed Law Commission headed by Macaulay to codify Indian Laws. This eventually resulted in the Indian Penal Code, Code of Civil and Criminal Procedures and other codes of laws.

Spread of Modern Education

1781: Hastings set up the Calcutta Madrasah for the study and teaching of Muslim law and related subjects

1791: Jonathan Duncan started a Sanskrit College at Varanasi for the study of Hindu law and philosophy.

1813: Charter of 1813 directed the Company to spend Rs. 1 lakh for promoting modern sciences in the country. This sum was however made available only in 1823.

1835: Macaulay’s minute.

English was made the medium of instruction in schools. Education of masses was however neglected. British advocated the ‘downward filtration theory’ for education. As per this theory, since the allocated funds could educate only a handful of Indians, it was decided to spend them in educating a few persons from the upper and middle classes who were expected to assume the task of educating the masses and spreading modern ideas among them.

1844: Compulsion for applicants for government employment to possess knowledge of English. This made the English medium schools more popular.

1854: Wood’s Dispatch asked the government of India to assume responsibility for the education of the masses. It thus repudiated the ‘downward filtration theory’. As a result, Departments of Education were instituted in all provinces and universities were setup in 1857 at Madras, Calcutta and Bombay.

The main reason why British adopted some measures towards education in India was because:

1. They needed educated people to man their system of administration. It was not possible to get enough Englishmen to man all the posts.
2. Another important motive was the belief that educated Indians would help expand the market for British manufactures in India.
3. Lastly, it was expected to reconcile the people of India to British rule.

Major drawbacks of the English education system:

1. Neglect of mass education. Mass literacy in India was hardly better in 1921 than in 1821. High fees in schools and colleges led to the education becoming a monopoly of the rich.
2. Almost total neglect of the education of girls. As late as 1921 only 2 percent Indian women could read and write.
3. Neglect of scientific and technical education.
4. The government was never willing to spend more than a scanty sum on education.

Development of Education

• Charter act of 1813
  • Sanctioned 1 lakh rupees annually for promoting education and modern sciences
  • Not made available till 1823
• Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy
• Lord Macaulay’s minute (1835)
• Wood’s Despatch (1854)
  • Rejected the downward filtration theory
  • Asked the government of India to assume the responsibility of education of the masses
  • English as medium for higher studies and vernaculars at school level
• 1857: University of Calcutta, Bombay and Madras
• Hunter Commission (1882-83)
  • State care required for promotion and spread of primary and secondary education
  • Transfer control of primary education to district and municipal boards
• Raleigh Commission, 1902
• Universities Act 1904
• Saddler Education Commission (1917-19)
  • School course should cover 12 years
  • Less rigidity in framing university regulations
• Hartog Committee (1929)
  • No hasty expansion or compulsion of education
• Wardha Scheme of basic education (1937)
  • Vocation based education

Contribution of early nationalists

• Early nationalists believed that a direct struggle for the political emancipation of the country was not yet on the agenda of history. On agenda was:
  • Creation of public interest in political questions and the organization of public opinion
  • Popular demands had to be formulated on a country-wide basis
  • National unity had to be created. Indian nationhood had to be carefully promoted.
• Early national leaders did not organize mass movement against the British. But they did carry out an ideological struggle against them. (Important from a Gramscian perspective)
• Economic critique of imperialism
  • Economic critique of imperialism was the most important contribution of the early nationalists
  • They recognized that the essence of British economic imperialism lay in the subordination of the Indian economy to the British economy
  • They complained of India’s growing poverty and economic backwardness and the failure of modern industry and agriculture to grow
  • They wanted the government to promote modern industries through tariff protection and direct government aid
  • Popularized the idea of swadeshi and the boycott of British goods
  • They propounded the ‘drain of wealth’ theory and demanded that this drain be stopped
  • Demanded reduction of taxes and land revenue
  • Condemned the high military expenditure
• Constitutional reforms
  • They were extremely cautious. From 1885 to 1892 they demanded the expansion and reform of the Legislative Councils
  • Due to their demands, the British passed the Indian Councils Act of 1892
  • They failed to broaden the base of their democratic demands. Did not demand the right to vote for the masses or for women
• Administrative and other reforms
  • They demanded Indianisation of the higher grades of the administrative services.
  • They had economic political reasons for this. Economically, appointment of British only to ICS made Indian administration costly because they were paid very high. Politically, appointment of Indians would make the administration more responsive to Indian needs
  • Demanded separation of the judicial from executive powers so that the people might get some protection from the arbitrary acts of the police and the bureaucracy.
  • Urged the government to undertake and develop welfare activities and education
• Defense of Civil Rights

Methods of work of early nationalists

• Dominated by moderates till 1905
• Method of moderates: Constitutional agitation within the four walls of the law, and slow, orderly political progress. Their work had two pronged direction:
  • To build a strong public opinion in India to arouse the political consciousness and national spirit of the people, and to educate and unite them on political questions
  • They wanted to persuade the British government and British public opinion to introduce reforms along directions laid down by the nationalists.
• In 1889, a British Committee of the INC was founded. In 1890 this committee started a journal called India.

What about the role of the masses?

• The basic weakness of the early national movement lay in its narrow social base.
• The leaders lacked political faith in the masses.
• Hence, masses were assigned a passive role in the early phase of the national movement.

Evaluation

• The basic objectives of the early nationalist leaders were to lay the foundations of a secular and democratic national movement, to politicize and politically educate the people, to form the headquarters of the movement, that is, to form an all-India leadership group, and to develop and propagate an anti-colonial nationalist ideology.
• Very few of the reforms for which the nationalists agitated were introduced by the government
• It succeeded in creating a wide national awakening and arousing the feeling of nationhood. It made the people conscious of the bonds of common political, economic and social interests and the existence of a common enemy in imperialism
• They exposed the true character of the British rule through their economic critique.
• All this was to become a base for the national movement in the later period.

WHY HUME?

• The leaders assumed that the rulers would be less suspicious and less likely to attack a potentially subversive organization if its chief organizer was a retired British civil servant.
• Gokhale himself stated explicitly in 1913 that if any Indian had started such a movement the officials wouldn’t have let it happen.

• First, the Indian intellectuals co-operated with the British in the hope that British would help modernize India.
• However, the reality of social development in India failed to conform to their hopes.
• Three people who carried out the economic analysis of British India:
  • Dadabhai Naoroji: the grand old man of India. Born in 1825, he became a successful businessman but devoted his entire life and wealth to the creation of national movement in India
  • Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade: He taught an entire generation of Indians the value of modern industrial development.
  • Romesh Chandra Dutt: a retired ICS officer, published The Economic History of India at the beginning of the 20^th century in which he examined in minute detail the entire economic record of colonial rule since 1757.
• They concluded that colonialism was the main obstacle to India’s economic development.
• Three aspects of domination of British: trade, industry, finance
• The problem of poverty was seen as a problem of national development. This approach made poverty a broad national issue and helped to unite, instead of divide, different regions and sections of Indian society.
• The early nationalists accepted that the complete economic transformation of the country on the basis of modern technology and capitalist enterprise was the primary goal of their economic policies.
• Because their whole-ted devotion to the cause of industrialization, the early nationalists looked upon all other issues such as foreign trade, railways, tariffs, finance and labour legislations in relation to this paramount aspect. (and hence the obsession of Nehru with industrialization)
• However great the need of India for industrialization, it had to be based on Indian capital and not foreign capital.
• The early nationalists saw foreign capital as an unmitigated evil which did not develop a country but exploited and impoverished it.
• Expenditure on railways could be seen as Indian subsidy to British industries.
• A major obstacle in the process of industrial development was the policy of free trade
• High expenditure on the army
• Drain theory was the focal point of nationalist critique of colonialism.
  • A large part of India’a capital and wealth was being transferred or drained to Britain in the form of salaries and pensions of British civil and military officials working in India, interest on loans taken by the Indian government, profits of British capitalists in India, and the Home Charges or expenses of the Indian Government in Britain.
  • This drain amounted to one-half of government revenues, more than the entire land revenue collection, and over one-third of India’s total savings.
  • The Drain theory was put forward by Dadabhai Naoroji. He declared that the drain was the basic cause of India’s poverty.
  • Through the drain theory, the exploitative character of the British rule was made visible.
  • The drain theory possessed the merit of being easily grasped and understood by a nation of peasants. No idea could arouse people more than the thought that they were being taxed so that others in far off lands might live in comfort.
  • This agitation on economic issues contributed to the undermining of the ideological hegemony of the alien rulers over Indian minds.
  • The nationalist economic agitation undermined the moral foundations inculcated by the British that foreign rule is beneficial for India.

 Freedom of Press

• On 29^th January 1780, the Hickey’s Bengal Gazette or the Calcutta General Advertizer was published. It was the first English newspaper to be printed in the Indian sub-continent.
• The press was the chief instrument of forming a nationalist ideology

• The resolutions and proceedings of the Congress were propagated through press. Trivia: nearly one third of the founding fathers of congress in 1885 were journalists.

• Main news papers and editors

• The Hindu and Swadesamitran: G Subramaniya Iyer
• Kesari and Mahratta: BG Tilak
• Bengalee: S N Banerjea
• Amrita Bazar Patrika: Sisir Kumar Ghosh and Motilal Ghosh
• Sudharak: GK Gokhale
• Indian Mirror: N N Sen
• Voice of India: Dadabhai Naoroji
• Hindustani and Advocate: GP Varma
• Tribune and Akhbar-i-Am in Punjab
• Indu Prakash, Dnyan Prakahs, Kal and Gujarati in Bombay
• Som Prakash, Banganivasi and Sadharani in Bengal

• Newspaper was not confined to the literates. It would reach the villages and would be read by a reader to tens of others.
• Reading and discussing newspaper became a form of political participation.
• Nearly all the major political controversies of the day were conducted through the Press.
• ‘Oppose, oppose, oppose’ was the motto of the Indian press.
• The section 124A of the IPC was such as to punish a person who evoked feelings of disaffection to the government.
• The Indian journalists remained outside 124A by adopting methods such as quoting the socialist and anti-imperialist newspapers of England or letters from radical British citizens
• The increasing influence of the newspapers led the government to pass the Vernacular Press Act of 1978, directed only against Indian language newspapers.
  • It was passed very secretively
  • The act provided for the confiscation of the printing press, paper and other materials of a newspaper if the government believed that it was publishing seditious materials and had flouted an official warning.
  • Due to the agitations, it was repealed in 1881 by Lord Ripon.
• SN Banerjee was the first Indian to go to jail in performance of his duty as a journalist.

B G Tilak

• The man who is most frequently associated with the struggle for the freedom of Press during the nationalist movement is Bal Gangadhar Tilak.
• In 1881, along with G G Agarkar, he founded the newspapers Kesari and Mahratta.
• In 1893, he started the practice of using the traditional religious Ganapati festival to propagate nationalist ideas through patriotic songs and speeches.
• In 1896, he started the Shivaji festival to stimulate nationalism among young Maharashtrians.
• He brought peasants and farmers into the national movement.
• He organized a no-tax campaign in Maharashtra in 1896-97
• Plague in Poona in 1897.
• Popular resentment against the official plague measures resulted in the assassination of Rand, the Chairman of the Plague Committee in Poona, and Lt. Ayerst by the Chaphekar brothers on 27 June 1898.
• Since 1894, anger had been rising against the government due to the tariff, currency and famine policy.
• Tilak was arrested and sentenced to 18 month rigorous imprisonment in 1897. This led to country wide protests and Tilak was given the title of Lokmanya.
• Tilak was again arrested and tried on 24 June 1908 on the charge of sedition under article 124A. He was sentenced to 6 years of transportation. This led to nationwide protests and closing down of markets for a week. Later, in 1922 Gandhi was tried on the same act and he said that he is proud to be associated with Tilak’s name.

• The Indian Councils Act of 1861 enlarged the Governor-General’s Executive Council for the purpose of making laws.
• The GG could add 6-12 members to the Executive Council. This came to be known as the Imperial Legislative Council. It didn’t have any powers.
• ‘Despotism controlled from home’ was the fundamental feature of British rule in India.
• The Indians nominated to the council were not representative of the nationalist movement.
• Despite the early nationalists believing that India should eventually become self-governing, they moved very cautiously in putting forward political demands regarding the structure of the state, for they were afraid of the Government declaring their activities seditious and disloyal and suppressing them.
• Till 1892, they only demanded reforms in the council.

Non Co-operation Movement

• Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms 1919: Dyarchy
• In a system called “dyarchy,” the nation-building departments of government — agriculture, education, public works, and the like — were placed under ministers who were individually responsible to the legislature. The departments that made up the “steel frame” of British rule — finance, revenue, and home affairs — were retained by executive councillors who were nominated by the Governor.
• The Hunter Committee report praised the actions of general Dyer.
• Khilafat Movement
  • For support of Turkey
  • Khilafat Committee formed under the leadership of Ali Brothers, Maulana Azad, Hakim Ajmal Khan and Hasrat Mohani
  • The promises made to the Khilafat Committee were not kept after the World War.
  • The All-India Khilafat Conference held at Delhi in November 1919 decided to withdraw all cooperation from the government if their demands were not met.
  • On June 9 1920, the Khilafat Committee at Allahabad unanimously accepted the suggestion of non-cooperation and asked Gandhiji to lead the movement.
• Khilafat movement cemented Hindu-Muslim unity
  • Gandhiji looked upon the Khilafat agitation as “an opportunity of uniting Hindus and Mohammedans as would not arise in a hundred years”
• The non-cooperation movement was launched on August 1, 1920. Lokmanya Tilak passed away on the same day.
• People countrywide observed hartal and took out processions.
• The congress met in September at Calcutta and accepted non-co-operation as its own.
• The programme of non-cooperation included:
  • Surrender of titles and honors
  • Boycott of government affiliated schools and colleges, law courts, foreign cloth and could be extended to resignation from government services.
  • Mass civil disobedience including the non-payment of taxes.
  • National schools and colleges were to be set up
  • Panchayats were to be established to settle disputes
  • Hand-spinning and weaving was encouraged
  • People were asked to maintain Hindu-Muslim unity, give up untouchability and observe strict non-violence.
• Changes in Congress to attain the new objective:
  • At the Nagpur session in 1920 changes in the Constitution of Congress were made.
  • The goal of congress was changed from the attainment of self-government by constitutional and legal means to the attainment of Swaraj by peaceful and legitimate means.
  • The Congress now had a Working Committee of fifteen members to look after its day to day affairs.
  • Provincial congress committees were now organized on a linguistic basis.
  • Mahalla and ward committees were formed.
  • The membership fee was reduced to 4 annas a years to enable poor to become members.
  • This was not without opposition however. Some members still believed in the traditional methods. Leaders like Jinnah, GS Khaparde, Bipin Chandra Pal and Annie Besant left congress during this time.
• Gandhiji, along with the Ali brother, undertook a nationwide tour to address people.
• Thousands of students left government schools and joined national schools.
• The most successful item of the programme was the boycott of foreign cloth.
• Picketing of toddy shops was also very popular.
• Students let government schools and colleges. IT was during this time that Jamia Milia Islamia of Aligarh, the Bihar Vidyapith, the Kashi Vidyapith and the Gujarat Vidyapith came into existence.
• Lawyers such as Deshbandhu CR Das, Motilal Nehru, Rajendra Prasad, Saifudiin Kitchlew, C Rajagopalachari, Sardar Patel, T Prakasam and Asaf Ali gave up their legal practice.
• Tilak Swarajya Fund was started to finance the NCM.
• In 1921, Khilafat Committee issued a resolution that no muslim should serve in the British Indian army.
• The visit of the Prince of Wales on 17^th November 1921 was observed as a day of hartal all over the country.
• The Congress Volunteer Corps emerged as a powerful parallel police.
• By December 1921, the government felt that things were going too far and announced a change of policy by declaring the volunteer corps illegal and arresting all those who claimed to be its members.
• Thousands of peasants and tenants participated in the movement.
• In Punjab, the Akali movement to remove corrupt mahants from the Gurudwaras was started.
• Assam: Tea plantation workers went on strike. Midnapore: peasants refused to pay Union Board taxes.             Guntur (Chirala): Agitation led by Duggirala Gopalakrishayya                        Malabar: Mohlahs (muslim peasants) created a powerful anti-zamindari movement.
• As the government refused to yield, Gandhiji announced that mass civil disobedience would begin in Bardoli taluqa of Surat.
• However, in Chauri Chaura, Gorakhpur on 5 February 1922 crowd set fire on a police station and killed some policemen. On hearing this, Gandhiji decided to withdraw the movement.
• The congress working committee ratified his decision. Thus, on February 12, 1922, the non-cooperation movement came to an end.
• Assessing the Withdrawal:
  • Some scholars say that Gandhiji withdrew the movement because he wanted to protect the interests of the propertied class.
  • Some argue that there was no logic why a small incident should lead to withdrawal of the movement itself.
  • However, government could use Chauri Chaura to justify its repression of the movement.
  • If movement was started at that time, it would have been defeated due to the repression of the government.
  • Gandhiji was protecting the movement from likely repression, and the people from demoralization.
  • Mass movements tend to ebb in some time. Hence, withdrawal is a part of the strategy of mass movements.
• Gandhiji was tried in 1922 and sentenced to six years’ imprisonment.
  • He invited the court to award him “the highest penalty that can be inflicted upon me for what in law is a deliberate crime, and what appears to be the highest duty of a citizen”.
• Positives out of the non-cooperation movement:
  • Congress started commanding the support and sympathy of vast sections of the Indian people.
  • Millions of Indians became politically involved. Women were drawn into the movement.
  • Muslims participated heavily and communal unity was maintained.
  • Strengthened the national movement. Nationalist sentiments and the national movement had reached the remotest corners of the land.
  • People gained tremendous self-confidence and self-esteem.

Lucknow Pact (1916)

• Nationalists saw that their disunity was affecting their cause
• Two important developments at the Lucknow Session of Congress
  • The two wings of the Congress were again united
  • The Congress and the Muslim League sank their old differences and put up common political demands before the government.
• INC and ML passed the same resolutions at their sessions, put forward a joint scheme of political reforms based on separate electorates, and demanded that the British Government should make a declaration that it would confer self-government on India at an early date.
• The pact accepted the principle of separate electorates
• Main clauses of the pact
  • There shall be self-government in India.
  • Muslims should be given one-third representation in the central government.
  • There should be separate electorates for all the communities until a community demanded joint electorates.
  • A system of weightage should be adopted.
  • The number of the members of Central Legislative Council should be increased to 150.
  • At the provincial level, four-fifth of the members of the Legislative Councils should be elected and one-fifth should be nominated.
  • The size of provincial legislatures should not be less than 125 in the major provinces and from 50 to 75 in the minor provinces.
  • All members, except those nominated, should be elected directly on the basis of adult franchise.
  • No bill concerning a community should be passed if the bill is opposed by three-fourth of the members of that community in the Legislative Council.
  • The term of the Legislative Council should be five years.
  • Members of Legislative Council should themselves elect their president.
  • Half of the members of Imperial Legislative Council should be Indians.
  • The Indian Council must be abolished.
  • The salaries of the Secretary of State for Indian Affairs should be paid by the British government and not from Indian funds.
  • Of the two Under Secretaries, one should be Indian.
  • The Executive should be separated from the Judiciary.
• Evaluation
  • As an immediate effect, the unity between the two factions of the congress and between INC and ML aroused great political enthusiasm in the country
  • However, it did not involve Hindu and Muslim masses and was based on the notion of bringing together the educated Hindus and Muslims as separate political entities without secularization of their political outlook
  • The pact therefore left the way open to the future resurgence of communalism in Indian politics.
• Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms
  • Provincial LC enlarged. More elected members
  • Dyarchy
    • Some subjects were reserved and remained under the direct control of the Governor; others such as education, public health and local self-government were called transferred subjects and were to be controlled by the ministers responsible to the legislature.
  • At the centre, there were two houses of legislature.
  • Response of nationalists
    • INC condemned the reforms as disappointing and unsatisfactory
    • Some others , led by Surendranath Banerjea, were in favour of accepting the government proposals. They left the Congress at this time and founded the Indian Liberal Federation
  • Evaluation
    • The governor could overrule the ministers on any grounds that he considered special
    • The legislature had virtually no control over the Governor-General and his Executive Council.
    • The central government had unrestricted control over the provincial governments

Rowlatt Act

• March 1919
• It authorized the Government to imprison any person without trial and conviction in a court of law.